[ Article ]

International Journal of Costume and Fashion - Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.49-60

ISSN: 2233-9051 (Print) 2288-7490 (Online)

Print publication date 30 Jun 2026

Received 30 Jan 2026 Revised 22 Apr 2026 Accepted 12 May 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2026.26.1.049

Motivational Types of Fashion Self-Gifting Under Social Disruption: The Role of Consumption Values and Narcissism Facets

Ji Yoon Kim ; Kyu-Hye Lee^†

Assistant Professor, Department of Web and Application Software Engineering, Dongyang Mirae University, South Korea
Professor, Department of Clothing and Textiles, Human-Tech Convergence Program, Hanyang University, South Korea

Correspondence to: ^† khlee@hanyang.ac.kr

Citation Kim, J. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2026). Motivational types of fashion self-gifting under social disruption: The role of consumption values and narcissism facets. International Journal of Costume and Fashion, 26(1), 49-60

Abstract

This study explores how narcissism facets and perceived consumption values are related to different motivations for fashion self-gifting. Rather than treating self-gift motivation as a predictor of later responses, the study considers reward-, therapy-, and celebration-motivated self-gifting as outcomes to be explained. Data were collected from 104 Korean consumers with self-gifting experience through an online survey conducted in 2023, and the data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Superiority was positively related to hedonic and epistemic value, whereas exhibitionism was positively related to hedonic and social value. Hedonic value significantly predicted reward- and therapy-motivated self-gifting, while epistemic value significantly predicted therapy- and celebration-motivated self-gifting. Social value did not significantly predict any of the three motivational types. Hedonic value also significantly mediated the relationship between exhibitionism and both reward- and therapy-motivated self-gifting, whereas the remaining indirect effects were not significant. The results suggest that fashion self-gifting is formed through more than one evaluative route and that different motivations are associated with different value dimensions.

Keywords:

Fashion self-gifting, Narcissism facets, Consumption values, Self-gift motivation

References

Cisek, S. Z., Sedikides, C., Hart, C. M., Godwin, H. J., Benson, V., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Narcissism and consumer behaviour: A review and preliminary findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 232. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00232]
Clarke, P. D., & Mortimer, G. (2013). Self-gifting guilt: An examination of self-gifting motivations and post-purchase regret. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(6), 472–483. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2013-0566]
Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 291-300. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_11]
Heath, T. P., Tynan, C., & Ennew, C. (2015). Accounts of self-gift giving: Nature, context and emotions. European Journal of Marketing, 49(7/8), 1067–1086. [https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2014-0153]
Holbrook, M. B. (Ed.). (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010679]
Holbrook, M. B. (2006). Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 714-725. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.008]
Hur, H. J., & Choo, H. J. (2016). Comforting or rewarding myself: Choices for self-gifting. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 7(4), 238–251. [https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2016.1198239]
Hwang, Y. S., & Ku, Y. S. (2010). Consumers’ narcissistic orientation and apparel products benefits sought. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 12(3), 338-346. [https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2010.12.3.338]
Jung, H. J., & Lee, J. Y. (2020). Impacts of fashion SNS users' consumption values on fashion brand loyalty and SNS word of mouth intentions: Exploring moderating effects of social capital and fashion SNS involvements. International Journal of Costume and Fashion, 20(1), 58-73. [https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2020.20.1.058]
Jang, S. Y., & Park, J. K. (2020). A study on the moderating effect of narcissism in relationship between perceived consumption value and purchasing intention. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 25(3), 63-85. [https://doi.org/10.37202/KMMR.2020.25.3.63]
Kim, J. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Influence of self-monitoring and narcissism on product involvement and purchasing behavior: Clothing and cosmetic product comparison. A Journal of Brand Design Association of Korea, 13(2), 199-211. [https://doi.org/10.18852/bdak.2015.13.2.199]
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34]
Lee, S.-H., & Yi, Y. (2013). Gift for myself: A qualitative study of self-gift behavior in Korea. Journal of Consumer Studies, 24(3), 123-156.
Mick, D. G., & DeMoss, M. (1990). Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 322-332. [https://doi.org/10.1086/208560]
Mick, D. G., & Faure, C. (1998). Consumer self-gifts in achievement contexts: The role of outcomes, attributions, emotions, and deservingness. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(4), 293-307. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00006-8]
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177-196. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1]
Mortimer, G., Bougoure, U. S., & Fazal-e-Hasan, S. M. (2015). Development and validation of the self-gifting consumer behaviour scale. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3), 165-179. [https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1506]
Park, S., & Oh, C. (2020). The effect of the self-gifting context and the dimension of attribution on the choice of hedonic product. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 20(1), 147-162. [https://doi.org/10.37272/JIECR.2020.02.20.1.147]
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879]
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890-902. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890]
Sedikides, C., & Hart, C. M. (2022). Narcissism and conspicuous consumption. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, Article 101322. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101322]
Seo, S. (2022). Self-gifting and consumer perceived values: Development and validation of a scale to measure consumer perceived values in self-gifting and applied to consumer satisfaction [Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro]. NC DOCKS.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8]
Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66. [https://doi.org/10.1086/321947]